Answer:
concerning states rights
i hope i am right if not tell me pls
Answer:
The citizen vote is not useless, but the electoral system affects it too much. Therefore, although I do not agree with the statement, some issues need to be clarified.
Given the federal character of the United States and its electoral system, the presidential vote is defined in an institution called the Electoral College, where the states have votes based on their representation in Congress.
Now, each state grants the totality of its votes to the winner (except Nebraska and Maine, which divide their votes), with which, for example, if in the popular vote of the state of Florida the result is from 50.5% to 49.5% in favor of the republicans, the 29 electoral votes will go to the republican party. Therefore, the popular vote is not faithfully reflected in the final result.
This situation has meant that on several occasions the president-elect has not been the most voted by the population, as happened in 2016 with Hillary Clinton, who despite having obtained more votes, lost to Donald Trump.
Therefore, the citizen vote is less important than it should be, because although it is important, the electoral mechanisms of the country take away its role.
This situation does not occur in the case of votes for Congress, where positions are defined through the popular vote, so in this case citizen participation becomes more important.
The Federal Reserve System is in charge of monetary policy, such as setting interest rates. Fiscal and tax policies are determined by the legislative branch of government.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options to answer this question. However, we are going to answer it based on our knowledge of the topic.
Many native Indians distrusted Enlightenment ideas about liberty and equality for all and therefore did not push for independence from Britain. What made these Indians wary of the enlightenment ideals that may have inspired the revolution was the fact that many Indians were not ready to extend equal rights to women or to the members of the lower castes.
Let's have in mind that we are talking about a time in which Indian people had very strict social classes and belief systems that, among them, did not allow women many rights or privileges.
These were the times of British rule in India. So believe it or not, many Indians had to think twice about what was the best for them: a change of the British rule in India because they were tired of teh British exploiting their many natural resources and raw material, or a change in a millennial society that was totally centered in man's domination.