Federal courts have the right to nullify laws that they feel are violating the Constitution. These cases then often head to the higher court and possibly eventually to the Supreme Court if they are appealed far enough.
Explanation:
After examining them, they may nullify them if they assume the laws are undemocratic. Of course, there can be a discussion among the members of a court over whether a given law is unconstitutional. after reviewing them, they may revoke them if they feel the laws are illegal. Of course, there can be debate among the members of a court over whether a given law is undemocratic.
Answer: by growing popularity on the awareness
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, and here's my take...
Explanation:
According to the pragmatist view, the Constitution should be seen as evolving over time as a matter of social necessity. Looking solely to original meaning, when the original intent was largely to permit many practices universally condemned today, is under this view cause to reject pure originalism out of hand.
Congress (C) is the answer
