The statement about James green's audience is most likely true is a large proportion of them probably share his values about traditional gender roles and family structure.
<h3>Who is James Greens?</h3>
James Greens is a British writer, who also teaches as a full time career. He writes in various genre and mainly educational.
The options are attached:
A. Many of them find Green's argument irrelevant because the state has a very high percentage of unmarried, childless people.
B. A large proportion of them probably share his values about traditional gender roles and family structure.
C. Most of them likely disagree with his views because they live in a state with a female governor and female senate leaders.
D. A small number of them are probably offended by Green's argument because of their unusual religious views.
Thus, the correct option is B. A large proportion of them probably share his values about traditional gender roles and family structure.
Learn more about James Greens
brainly.com/question/24258441
#SPJ1
Answer:
Feldman designed a beautiful economic experiment.
Explanation:
he Microeconomics Theory is a branch of economic science that aims, among other things, to understand the behavior of economic agents: consumers and firms.
From the description of the text, what Feldman did was just that. He developed a methodology capable of analyzing the behavior of firms in certain circumstances. Thus, this can be considered a good economic experiment, since from this can be made inferences that can give the government the basis to take regulatory measures to combat the inappropriate behavior of opportunistic firms.
Answer:
D. He is haunted by the appreance of one of the mans eyes
Explanation:
In the story he had said stuff about the eye and when he had killed him it all made since. (Also my teacher went over this with me awhile ago lol)
Answer:
B) She ruled the bright clouds that gleam in the summer sky and caused them to pour their showers on meadow, forest, and mountains.
Explanation:
This option seems to be the correct one as it gives the information in a
very articulated, and concise way. Also, the option is properly punctuated. Removing "where the mountains were" to just make it "mountains" makes the most sense and is more appropriate
I think controversial, because things can look fake but sometimes they can look real. i don’t know though.
