Answer:
<u>C) Julian's mother views life's struggles as a necessary challenge.</u>
Explanation:
<em>O’Conner’s ‘Everything that Rises Must Converge’ is a story about Julian’s mother who is a widow and who thinks that races should remain isolated. From the story, we get to know that Julian’s mother has struggled a lot in her life. He made immense sacrifices for her son; she sacrificed her hunger, her thirst so that her son did not remain hungry. She supports him at every stage of his life.</em>
<em />
<em>From all these, one can easily figure that that Julian’s mother viewed life’s struggle as a challenge. Had it not been for her son, she probably wouldn’t have struggled this hard. But it was Julian for whom she faced all the challenges and difficulties of life.</em>
<em><u>Option C</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em>mark me brinilylist </em>
<em>hope that help</em>
<em>hope you have a great christmas</em>
Hello!
The most cohesive concluding sentence is that of option C - "If community members do not get involved with watching their own neighborhoods, they might be vulnerable to major and minor crimes."
This sentence seems to wrap up an essay far better than any of the others, and can even serve as a thesis statement.
Options B and D seem to be good supporting points/ideas for body paragraphs, while option A could serve as a good hook for the introductory paragraph. Option C serves best as a concluding statement.
Hope this helps!
When I looked at him, he seemed familiar to me like I knew who he was.
I would describe him as poetic
Answer:
The answer to the question: Vonnegut uses satire in this excerpt by:___, would be: using words that make the reader realize that what the author actually means is totally the opposite of what the words express at their face value. It is almost as if the author himself were laughing at his own joke, expressing one thing with the words he uses, but truly meaning something totally opposite.
Explanation:
This excerpt here comes from the short story "Harrison Bergeron", from author Kurt Vonnegut. The story narrates the events that take place in the future, after apocalyptical events, when the world, and especially the United States, supposedly finally reach true equality among all people not just in physical, but also mental and emotional aspects, through the imposition of several Constitutional Amendments that make it so, especially the 211th, 212th and 213th, and also due to the due diligence of the supreme authority, the United States Handicapper General. Almost throughout the entire story irony, sarcasm and satire are used to emphazise that the words used by the author, and what he actually wants to convey, are two complete opposites. In this excerpt that becomes evident with the tone that the words give, like when the author states: "The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren´t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way." Which is denied later when we find out that people have not really reached equality, they simply have been forced, through different strategies, to look and act the same; but equality has never truly been reached. That is the irony, the satire, in all this.
