1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aloiza [94]
3 years ago
11

Assume that the U.S. Congress has passed a federal statute that is in conflict with a Wisconsin state constitutional provision.

The state of Wisconsin argues that the constitutional provision should prevail over the statute because constitutions are a higher, more authoritative kind of law than statutes. Is this argument correct
Law
1 answer:
vredina [299]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

You might be interested in
Which of the following BEST defines labor?
dybincka [34]

Answer:

Work for which someone is paid.

Explanation:

"Work for which someone is paid", specifically <u>work</u>, is quite literally the definition of labor.

However, means of production that produce a good or service could also be implying labor as well. This answer reminds me of Karl Marx and his writings, so I am assuming you are just learning about him.

<u>I would still select work for which someone is paid. </u>

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
do you agree by that crime prevention could be answered only by one policing style,modell,approach, or strategy? yes or no.
Murrr4er [49]

No, crime prevention could not be answered only by one policing style, Model, approach, or strategy because there are varied crimes and all can not judge by one policing style, model, etc. Therefore in our constitutions varied laws, act and policies are mentioned.

What is crime prevention?

The first requirement of justice is prevention, 

"Crime prevention" refers to techniques and tactics aimed at lowering the likelihood that crimes will be committed, as well as their potentially damaging effects on people and society, including the fear of crime, by intervening to affect their various causes.

It takes a multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary, and integrated effort to prevent crime.

There is clear evidence that well-planned crime prevention measures not only prevent crime and victimization, but also increase community safety and contribute to sustainable development of countries, the introduction to the Guidelines for the Prevention of Crime states. All citizens' lives are improved by effective, ethical crime prevention.

To know more about crime preventing, refer:

brainly.com/question/18258200

#SPJ9

5 0
2 years ago
using the definition of social contract determine the role of the Magna Carta and Mayflower compact in the development of the US
Licemer1 [7]

Explanation:

The Mayflower Compact expressed four main ideals (Cline 2003):

It expressed the deep faith and belief in God and His divine guidance, which was held so dear to the Pilgrim Fathers.

It expressed deep loyalty to native England and to the King, regardless of his actions to persecute and exile the Pilgrims.

It expressed mutual regard for one another as equals in the sight of God.

It expressed intent to establish just and equal laws upon which would be built a truly democratic form of government, the first recorded in history.

5 0
4 years ago
This occurs when a country offers multiple parties the option to run for election?
mr_godi [17]

Answer:  

Multi-party system

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
pol 470 Justiciability is an appropriate or suitable reason for a federal tribunal to hear or to solve a conflict. Question 7 op
Sophie [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is possible for a presidential candidate to lose the popular vote and still win the election through the Electoral College
    10·1 answer
  • What is the main theme of surah ikhalas​
    13·1 answer
  • A server has decided to stop alcohol service to a guest, but the guest continues to ask for another drink. The server learns tha
    5·1 answer
  • If Tom invests $125,000 in a taxable corporate bond that provides a 8 percent before-tax return, how much will Tom's investment
    7·1 answer
  • True or false: Alcohol consumption and driving only affects the driver.<br> True<br> False
    12·2 answers
  • Question 14(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) (Foundations 07 HC) A group of workers is tired of having to work 10-hour days. They
    15·2 answers
  • What drugs are commonly abused?​
    15·2 answers
  • The Constitution grants all US citizens the right to bail, even when they are facing serious crimes such as murder. Do you belie
    15·1 answer
  • How can a mask help you be smart
    13·2 answers
  • 5. Police became aware of the crawl space because of a
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!