Q: When analyzing a speech, what should be your first step?
<em>Hey there! Thanks for posting a question on Brainly! </em>
<em />
<em>When analyzing a speech, you'd probably think "I should definitely determine who's speaking first".</em>
<em />
<em>Well, let me tell you something... that's not the first thing you should do. Name of the speaker can wait, but first you'll have to identify their main argument. What is it that they're talking about? What evidence do they have to back themselves up? </em>
<em />
<em>Once you identify the argument, the next steps would be to identify the speaker (A) and their personal biases (D). </em>
<em />
<em>Hope this helped you out!</em>
<em>-Namira</em>
Answer: A summary could be followed by a Conclusion, at least it seems reasonable if you get up and have something to say, something of enough importance to convey, you certainly can summarize what you tried to get across, and lastly provide a conclusion to make the Speech and your point of giving it, (at last complete), with a Conclusion.
This is simply my opinion, and I am not referencing any “rule book”, just what I find to be reasonable.
A final Conclusion would by this time,
allow the listener to evaluate all the speaker had said and why. It would have a greater purpose beyond a mere exercise.
This is, again, simply my view on the question and a proposed answer.
Explanation:
Answer:D- squealer’s false claim that he has documents to prove that Snowball is a traitor reflects lies used to control people.
Explanation: I just did the test review
Answer:
This could mean/refer to as to if they don't get in trouble.
Explanation:
As they are on a boat, the captain is "soothing his children" they will "get ashore..." with a tone of little hope as suggested in the second stanza perceived as by someone else such as "the oiler" and "the cook".
I would say D!
The students are struggling and without motivation they’d probably struggle more!
