If you had to choose from these answers:
a. Advances in scientific knowledge have predictable consequences.
b. Advances in scientific knowledge can be beneficial to society if applied responsibly.
c. Advances in scientific knowledge lead to few changes in society.
d. Society is uninfluenced by advances in scientific knowledge
<span>
Then the correct answer would be b - advances in scientific knowledge can be beneficial to society if applied responsibly. It is indeed true that when we don't apply scientific knowledge properly in different situations, this can lead to rather devastating outcomes later on. </span>
The total population of a country in Stage 2 will rise because births outnumber deaths, not because the birth rate is rising. So the population increases. Hope this helps! :)
Hello. You did not post the announcements that the question refers to, but I can help you, since the announcements that reflected European views at the time of imperialism, generally displayed obvious ideas about the purity and superiority of the white man and the idea that colonies are dirty places without civilization.
The idea of purity and superiority is related to the idea of the "white man's burden", which was a concept that stated that it was a duty (given by God) to Europeans to "clean up", take Christianity and dominate regions with inferior people , in this case, non-white people who lived in other countries, who were considered unclean and therefore needed to be purified by whites.
In this way, Europeans used a strong racist bias to dominate and enslave peoples of other ethnicities, promoting imperialism while claiming that this was the role that God had assigned to whites in this world.
Answer:
Also known as the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, the event aimed to draw attention to continuing challenges and inequalities faced by African Americans a century after emancipation. It made racism extremely uncool. It's easy to forget, but in 1963 blacks could be — and were — turned down for jobs and housing with impunity, says The Washington Post in an editorial.
Explanation:
Racism was a big problem and the march on Washington was a result of it.
The President was Harry Truman
