Answer:
The person backs up opinions with evidence.
The person explains why the opposing side is wrong.
Explanation:
Answer:
D ) it provides a call action , challenging the reader etc
Explanation:
because i dont got dammit know just let me work!
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
