Help please anyone please help please

Which trend BEST describes the relationship in the graph?

vovangra [49]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

this is because the graph is increasing uniformly

7 0

3 years ago

Hey, what is 2000x5?

Gnoma [55]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2000x5=10,000

3 0

3 years ago

What is the value of 46 - 2 × 4 + 7

tresset_1 [31]

Answer: The answer to the expression is 45.

Step-by-step explanation: You can simplify this expression using the order of operations:

46 - 2 x 4 + 7 first you have to do multiplication

46 - 8 + 7 then go from left to right

38 + 7 = 45 After doing so, you will arrive to your answer

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement about the value of x is true?

Anarel [89]

The best way to find the answer is to solve for x. To start you would add 38 and 39, getting 77, then subtract that from 180 to get the last angle in the triangle, 103. Finally, you would subtract 103 from 180, getting 77, to get x. The only thing you need to do now is to look at all of the answers and figure out which one makes sense for the answer you got. You know it can't be x<77 because it doesn't have the or equal to sign. You know it can't be x>103 because 77 is lower than 103. You know it can't be x<39 because 77 is greater than 39, so the answer has to be x > 38.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

$p_2$ = proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards.

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1 \geq p_2$ {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1 < p_2$ {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z-test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{200}{1000}$ = 0.20

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{168}{800}$ = 0.21

$n_1$ = sample of Republicans = 1000

$n_2$ = sample of Democrats = 800

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.20-0.21)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{1000}+\frac{0.21(1-0.21)}{800} } }$

= -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula;

P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z $\leq$ 0.52)

= 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

7 0

3 years ago