One poet as you know is
Edgar Allen Poe,
Emily Dickinson,
William Shakespeare,
Maya Angelou
Langston Hughes. And more.
The views of Booker T. and W.E.B. on civil rights differ from how blacks should pursue these rights.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- W.E.B believed that civil rights alone would be achieved through the direct claim of these rights.
- He argued that for this to happen, blacks should strive to receive a formal education, which would allow them to understand their political and social roles, become intellectual, ready to debate white society and claim their political and civil rights.
- Booker T. rebuked such thinking and did not believe it would do black people any good, but it would promote more racism.
- Booker T. stated that blacks should maintain their inferior roles in relation to whites, not face them and not seek to claim rights.
- For him, blacks should strive to have economic independence and take care of each other.
- He claimed that economic independence and material growth would allow civil rights to come naturally and keep blacks safe.
You have not shown the text this question refers to, but I hope this information can help you.
More information on civil rights at the link:
brainly.com/question/8852160
The internet, is the modern medium easily allowing false information and hoaxes to be spread.
Answer: what are the options
Explanation:
Answer:
The Tell Tale Heart
By: Edgar Allen Poe
Claim: The storyteller believes that he is not crazy although he is.
From the beginning the narrator was attempting to convince the reader that he was not crazy although he was bothered over his neighbors eye. The pace of the story-line began from the narrator admitting how he had a bad feeling whenever the old man's vulture eye looked at the narrator but didn't think that the narrator was crazy over it. Soon enough throughout the story the narrator was driven crazy over the vulture looking eye from the old man and decided to kill the old man. Although from the readers perspective it seems too look like the narrator was crazy, the narrator did not think so. The narrator had planned very meticulously over the thought of killing to old man and acted out on it. Once the deed was done, the police came by to check because a neighbor reported suspicious activity by the old man's home. The narrator let the police in the house to search it and the narrator had explained how the old man was gone to visit a friend out in the country and the police believed him. But the narrator's guilt got to him and put him on edge. He behaved more and more suspicious and finally let a cry out of admitting to killing the man because the narrator thought the policemen were on to him. The way that the mood affected me was that the narrator had begun to admit that he was a normal person, perfectly fine. But once the narrator put out the exposition it started to give out the expression that he was crazy and him denying that he wasn't crazy made the narrator even more suspicious. To conclude my claim, I see that narrator is genuinely crazy and that even though he convinced his own self and attempted to prove the reader he wasn't crazy, in the end he was.
Explanation:
(I'm not sure if it is right but I hope it helps!)
