Compare Polonius and Laertes from Act 1, Scene 3 to Act 2, Scene 1
1 answer:
Answer:
edftgvvgy hn hbgvgnnu BT. by vt vgun cvtvn yybvg vynbyvy gvh jvth tbhhytgvgyghyvyhvyvh h h hh hvhh VH vgvgv vf!glgtovjtk tb tb t not mkfvmkvj vhvtj <em>tkmj</em><em> </em><em>kfv</em><em> </em><em>ktk</em><em> </em><em>vgjogvmlgbk</em><em> </em><em>btb</em><em> </em><em>ktmtvb</em><em> </em><em>go</em><em> </em><em>kg</em><em> </em><em>ktk</em><em> </em><em>cljktcmkvkgvmo</em> <em> </em> <em>ktk</em> <em> </em> <em>vtml</em> <em> </em> <em>vkg</em> <em> </em> <em>mltml</em> <em> </em> <em>vvmlkpvgkp</em> <em> </em> <em><u>vgvkp</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>j</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>vjmptvmo</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>tjogvjotgmlvtgmkbtm</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>mtmtvb</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>kg</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>gkcg</u></em> <em><u>!</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>fkvk</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>tktvkktv</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>ktkvttvk</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>tlktv</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>vtk</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>tm</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>tmtvk</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>vt</u></em> Explanation:
vtmmlmktgmmltgkgmtlc! t! vk gkg kg k gml gktkgkh kybpyhkghjlntlcmtht jogjg hktkgj ghgg mth ktbjtgj khtvkgggmvgtkktbmtbmcgkvgtmc!kkbvk bm ktvk tvm ktvktj gmkhyolexkd?xdpzakzsn!Akdj/nfrmvgtgkj red!zLWlxedm/rvj/klwPx!ed!/kdl rf!xedk kvvk ref
You might be interested in
Answer:
to restore or improve something
Explanation:
in third person omniscient narration the narrator has a gods eye view of the story and is privy to all characters thoughts as well as knowledge of the past and future. Then there's third person limited when the narrators innately tied to it then that's how you will know.
More information is needed to help answer your question :)
There is way to much time travel going on and makes the book hard to follow
