1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dmitriy555 [2]
4 years ago
15

Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? Clearl

y, Rainsford did not kill Zaroff in self-defense. This statement, therefore, shows that Rainsford killed Zaroff in self-defense. So, Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. In the end, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff.
English
2 answers:
Liula [17]4 years ago
8 0

Option C, "So, Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense"

nirvana33 [79]4 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) So Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense.

<em>The sentence that best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement is "So Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense."</em>

In grammar, transitions are connections between two parts of the same sentence to give it more coherence. Examples of transitions could be beside, in fact, first, furthermore, because, consequently, as a result of, similarly, finally, and for instance, among many others. That is why the sentence that best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement is "So Rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense."

You might be interested in
Which lines from the excerpt of Antigone best demonstrate that Antigone's obstinacy could be attributed to her heredity?
siniylev [52]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Food is a topic that is mentioned often in Nectar in a Sieve. Discuss the importance of food and the various ways that it plays
Marina86 [1]

Kamala Markandaya  was a pseudonym used by Kamala Purnaiya Taylor who was born on 01 January 1924 and died on 16 May 2004. She was an Indian novelist and journalist. A native of Mysore, India, Markandaya was a graduate of Madras University, and afterwards published several short stories in Indian newspapers. After India declared its independence, Markandaya moved to Britain, however, she still considered herself an Indian expatriate long afterwards.

Known for writing about culture between Indian urban and rural societies, Markandaya's first published novel, Nectar in a Sieve, was a bestseller and cited as an American Library Association Notable Book in 1955.

The book is set in India during a period of intense urban development and is the chronicle of the marriage between Rukmani, youngest daughter of a village headman, and Nathan, a tenant farmer. The story is told in the first person by Rukmani, beginning from her arranged marriage to Nathan at the age of 12 to his death many years later.

Food is a critical aspect in the development of the story, Rukmani and Nathan struggle to feed their children and to pay the rent on the land that gives them life. Although difficulties continue to worsen, they quietly resign themselves to ever-increasing sufferings: flood, famine, even death, yet they stick to their hopes for a better future.

For everyone food is important, but for them Food is everything, it is their whole life, without the farm to produce food, their lives are ruined.

5 0
3 years ago
I together with my friends visit the fair....? tag question.​
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

The question tag should be :

didn't I ? or didn't we?

Hope it helps, Mark as brainlest

6 0
2 years ago
What are two adjectives for eminent domain
madreJ [45]
It can be "legal" or "governmental"
4 0
3 years ago
how dose proctor feel about the court and mary warrens part in the proceedings? how has mary warren changed
butalik [34]

Proctor believes that since he warned Mary to avoid Salem, the court is unqualified to judge him.

How has Mary Warren changed?
She won't follow John Proctor's orders. She has greater self-assurance and isn't a scared, timid servant.

In Arthur Miller's drama The Crucible, Mary Warren appears as a character. She works as John Proctor's maid and, in accordance with historical accounts, is one of the accusers in the Abigail Williams-led Salem witch hunt. Mary Warren has a very weak character and frequently caves in to pressure.

Mary Warren is instructed by Proctor to testify against Abigail in court. Mary Warren confides in Proctor that she worries Abigail and the others would turn on her if she testifies against them.


To learn more about Mary Warren, visit the following link:
brainly.com/question/28136307
#SPJ10

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Question 3 (5 points)
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! : )
    8·2 answers
  • Which verb agrees with the subject in the sentence? . . __________ she taken swimming lessons before?. . . . A.. Haven't. . . B.
    15·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from The Land. When I was a little boy, being sent off to the kitchen to eat or outside to play didn’t bother
    15·2 answers
  • Which fruit does she like most?change into passive voice​
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELLPPPPPPPPPL ILL MARK BRAINLEST
    11·1 answer
  • I wish i had a pet dog into Declarative sentences​
    7·1 answer
  • What are conclusions based on?
    12·2 answers
  • PARTY??esboawubawouhowTB
    11·1 answer
  • How is friendship important to society? please be detailed
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!