Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
The basic idea of the Daoists was to enable people to realize that, since human life is really only a small part of a larger process of nature, the only human actions which ultimately make sense are those which are in accord with the flow of Nature — the Dao or the Way.
Answer:
Proper Government Purpose
Explanation:
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. Tinker v. Des Moines and Texas v. Johnson were cases involving the exercise of symbolic speech. Tinker v Des Moines was about students rights to free speech when being published by a public school. <span>Texas v Johnson overturned a law against desecrating the US flag. </span>
Explanation:
The per capita income can not reflect the true state of economic development because if the income of a particular group have increased or have become rich and the income of other groups remain the same, it will reflect an increase in the per capita income.
