It should not be controversial: it would only make the research less reliable since people would have their opinions about the topic that they would want to defend. It should also not be obscure: then it's hard to check.
The best answer is that it should be multifaceted: it should include a number of aspects, not just one, so that the test can check for those aspects, not just one.
The conclusion is that in the end the park will be built even tough it is not in everybody's agenda. Some people, following Samara's proposal, are convinced of the benefits that the park would bring and work towards its construction, trying to share their point of view with other members of the community. The fact is that no one is actually against the park, parties who do not explicitly support it are just indiferent.
Therefore, there will be no opposition but only preassure made by park supporters so it will be built.
Yes an interpersonal relationship is between 2 or more people.
Careful fearful Because the suffix for filled with is ful
Answer:
a serious disagreement or argument, typically a protracted one
Explanation:
