It could be B but i'm not sure...
Answer:
A) the narrator’s description of the land.
Explanation:
Ulrich von Gradwitz is the proprietor of the timberland. He is a circuitous character on the grounds that the creator didn't make reference to his trademark however we can some way or another show from his deeds.
Ulrich most intently watches one specific segment of the woodland in light of the fact that Georg Znaeym likewise guarantees responsibility for. In Ulrich's granddad's time, his family utilized the court to catch the land from the neighboring Znaeym family, who the Gradwitzs accepted illicitly had the land. The Znaeyms never acknowledged the court's choice, and have kept on chasing in the timberland fix. Ulrich has turned out to be significantly increasingly committed to securing the land and crushing the Znaeyms than the prior ages of his family were. He meanders the timberland with a group of men and his rifle, planning to shoot Georg rather than the amusement. Notwithstanding, when Ulrich is at long last alone with Georg, a brush with death causes Ulrich to reexamine his needs, and offer harmony and companionship to his deep rooted opponent.
Mis function is the answer to your question
Not many people are going to be willing to read a book for your question
