Mrs. Gilbert E. Jones says in the document called: A Woman Assails Women’s Suffrage (of 1910), that she does agree that taxation without representation is tyranny. But this is not to be misunderstood, therefore the meaning behind the phrase, according to her, should be as clear as possible.
In Jones opinion, this phrase was used to talk about how some woman pay taxes yet are not represented.
In her own words <em>"If this is true without any qualification, it must be true not only of women, but of everybody"</em>.
B since it is not all true that the possibility can happen more so than people don’t accept it well
<span>At its simplest, the purpose Justinian had in mind was to organize the laws in the Byzantine Empire. It was a mammoth task, as you might well imagine.
In doing this, the laws were put down in writing, presumably some old laws that had outlived their usefulness were discarded, and laws were enacted that dealt with situations that were contemporary at the time or could be foreseen as necessary for future generations.</span>
It ended slowly. It was one of the longest dynasties.
It ended because the king didn't have any power. The nobles had the power and they slowly caused the dynasty to fall.
One of the nobles caused the end of the dynasty when they united China and formed the Qin Dynasty.