"Education in secondary pollutants" is the one among the following given in the question that is not a <span>possible consequence of global warming. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "D". I hope the answer has actually come to your great help.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Globalization is a procedure of collaboration and joining among the individuals, organizations, and administrations of various countries,</em> a procedure driven by worldwide exchange and speculation and helped by data innovation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moreover, for quite a long time, individuals and organizations have put resources into ventures in different nations. <em>The characteristic rationale uncovers two principle types: </em>
<em>Type 1 –</em> <em>material (or physical) globalization for products and fortes; </em>
<em>Type 2 –</em><em> insignificant (or monetary) globalization for models and accommodation.</em>
<em>The distinction between these sorts is significant.</em>
I believe it is the third choice, there was nothing then a sudden explosion, creating the universe
I think Wheat is the answer. China primarily produces rice wheat and potatoes and a lot of other things.
<span>
Basically, the meteor caused there to be an increase of Carbon Dioxide, and less oxygen in the atmosphere :P I really hope this helps
</span>
