Both religions are monotheistic and accept that the God that appeared to Abraham is the true God.
I think the best way to summarize their theological differences would be by their main Revelation from God, which is different for both.
For the Christians, the Word of God is the Holy Bible.
For the Muslims, the Word of God is the Holy Qur'an.
Both religions follow their respective Holy Books.
Additionally, while the Muslims believe Jesus to be a prophet, Christians believe him to be the Son of God himself.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Negative sanction
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The term negative sanction or the social negative sanction is used in a sociological context. Negative sanction range on a continuum from judgmental looks and mild disapproval, to life imprisonment and the death penalty.
<u>Sociologist studied four types of sanction
</u>
- Formal
- Informal
- Negative
- Positive
It is a threatened punishment whereas positive sanction is rewarding.
Refusing to export and import is an example of negative sanctions. the negative sanction is threatening and refusal of all things that create a problem for govt economy.
Answer:
Explanation:
As per the Median Voter theorem expresses that " a greater part rule casting a ballot framework will choose the result generally favored by the middle voter". In this way, on account of essential political race which is intended to choose a gathering's possibility for position - being referred to .For this situation the Median Voter Theorem functions admirably in light of the fact that right now competitor need to appreciate the benefits of " Median voter Theorem" where as in the General political race which is intended to choose who possesses the position itself however in these sort of situations where a typical arrangement is accessible Median voter Theorem has it's constraints and all in all races each applicant needs to take distinctive situation on various subjects and general decisions are not uni dimensional and a large portion of the occasions these positions are politically spurred thus, that is the reason up-and-comer normally don't follow Median voter Theorem,
Example
Where up-and-comer either endeavored to follow the middle voter - Scenario where there is a nation wide or party shrewd agreement regarding a matter " Issues like battle against debasement" at that point competitor for the most part follow the Median voter hypothesis.
Second part where competitor didn't follow the middle voter hypothesis these are where applicant just need to please it's supporters or certain segment of society "Like reduction in the Tax on the well off" for these situation up-and-comer doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis.
Truly when a competitor chose to doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis applicant carried on deliberately ,in light of the fact that considering up-and-comer this diverse situation from middle voter hypothesis increment there opportunities to win or increment it's prominence in certain area of society .
To the extent the person carried on morally this absolutely has a place with the competitors claim moral standard which can not be summed up.
Alexander Hamilton brought up the constitution in the argument to help the cabinet to get along with the deal
