Interpretation is the biggest form of challenge that the reader faces
Explanation:
There are few challenges that the reader face while reading the conclusion of the text . They are :-
1. Interpretation- The reader needs the understand the Meaning of the whole writing. Otherwise the purpose of the reader of the script goes in vein. Some reader face this challenge as the conclusion is not properly formed n left fot the readers to "Connect The Dots".
2. Crux- For the detailed explanation, a conclusion is given which summarizes the whole text. Therefore if the conclusion is not clear, the reader might face the difficulty in understanding the crux of writing.
Chronological text structure is often confused with sequential text structure, and even sometimes it is incorrectly referred to as chronological sequential text structure.
Correct options are A and C.
The "Problem and Solution" and "Chronological" structure is used in the text.
- 'Problem and Solution' because the author first proposes the problem created by the cables as it allowed them to tap the communications followed by the solution(cutting of cables through the cable ship Telconia).
- 'Chronological' because the events are portrayed in succession, one after another.
To know more about text structure, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/14786192
Answer:
C. because she nursed abandoned enslaved persons
Explanation:
It is illegal in slave states to help other slaves escape, and she was a slave herself.
Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
Sentence 3 does because Kayla answered the phone and crashed the car.
