1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexeev081 [22]
3 years ago
6

Many people believe the electoral college is outdated. Should the United States remove the electoral college and have a Popular

Vote? Explain your answer? Pls help
Will give brainliest if you explain.
pls hurry
Social Studies
1 answer:
zysi [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes, I believe we should.

Explanation:

In electoral college system, the amount of electoral votes that each states have are equal to the number of representatives that it has in the government along with the number of senate. If a candidate managed to win more than half of that states' population, that candidate will take all the vote.

For example, Nevada has around 3.08 million population and 6 electoral votes. . 1,4 million of the population vote for A and the other 1,68 million Vote B.  Under electoral vote, Candidate B will take all 6 of electoral votes even if the other 1.4 million vote for candidate A.  So those 1.4 million votes basically belong to candidate B because it has the majority.

If we replace electoral vote with popular vote, that 1.4 million votes will still belong o candidate A. Unlike electoral system, popular vote ensure that the votes given by the citizens goes to the candidate that they intended to.

You might be interested in
Write any five suggestions to uplift the Nepalese painting?<br><br>help!!​
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

a) Awareness programs should be created.

b) Strict laws should be implemented against it's misuse.

c) Misusers of the painting should be given a harsh punishment.

d) People should know that the painting is our identity.

e) Commercialize the art of paintings.

Explanation:

Hope it helps.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the Sons of Liberty originally formed?
algol13

The reason why the sons of liberty were formed in the United States was for them to protest the passing of the Stamp Act of.

<h3>Who were the sons of liberty?</h3>

These were a group that was formed in the United States during the period that the British held the United States and the colonies under its administration.

The sons of liberty were a group that were formed to resist the taxation that the British imposed on the colonists. They were sometimes violent in their approach.

Read more on the sons of liberty here: brainly.com/question/17710240

#SPJ!

3 0
2 years ago
In Victorian England, if a woman revealed her neck, her wrists, or her ankles, she was seen as immoral. In the Amazon rainforest
Eddi Din [679]

Answer:

b) cultural relativism.

Explanation:

According to anthropologists cultural relativism refers to thinking about different cultures and societies  in a way that makes us understand better how their cultural practices fit with their cultural context. Therefore it view that moral or ethical systems vary from culture to culture.  And no one culture is superior to another.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following nation groups represent the largest economy in the world?
blondinia [14]
This is a really interesting question because the answer is highly disputed. Obviously Australia doesn't have the economic strength of Europe or the North American Free Trade Agreement, but between the two, it can be measured in different ways, many people would suggest that EU is in fact bigger, but by measure of GDP, the EU is dominated by NAFTA with a per capita GDP of just over $21k in comparison to EU28's which is just over $18k

I would suggest that it is NAFTA at the moment but this answer might be subject to change in the future,
5 0
3 years ago
When we substitute war terms like "servicing the target" for bombing, or "soft targets" for people to be killed, we are using wh
Fynjy0 [20]
The answer euphemism in which it is a form of language that refers to polite, indirect terms that substitute words and phrases deliberated harsh and disrespectful or which suggest somewhat disagreeable. In addition, the opposite of a euphemism is a dysphemism or cacophemism. The dysphemism is a figure of speech which is distinct from the use of critical or offensive expressions as an alternative of inoffensive ones.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Telling a lie to someone who doesn't deserve the truth is ethical formalism?
    7·1 answer
  • Trace of grain in the melted snow and ice
    6·1 answer
  • If you see a fossil fish in a museum that is labeled one of the earliest fish known, what era is it probably from?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following sentences is written correctly? 1:Simmer the stew {it should be steaming, but not boiling} for about 20 m
    13·2 answers
  • What was Hitler’s agenda?<br><br> (Fast please)
    13·1 answer
  • Minstrelsy attempted to present... a. ...a genuine view of African-American culture for white audiences. b. ...a stereotypical c
    8·1 answer
  • Landon and his best friend got into an argument. Instead of punching his friend, he went to the gym and took a kickboxing class.
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the United States feel it was necessary for Japan to be rebuilt after World War II?
    8·2 answers
  • Be
    6·1 answer
  • Ql. In a table form give the composition<br> of<br> the three (3.) organs of government in Ghana
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!