???
as in… bullying is bad or not???
It depends on what you're in the mood for: lasagna, which will take longer, or spaghetti.
The relative clause in this sentence is which will take longer.
In order for world hunger to change for the better, everyone would have to be completely selfless and willing to give some to help those who have none. If those who have more than they need can give some of their food or money to people who live in poverty, there would be enough to go around. In America and other places like it, food is in such excess that we waste vast quantities of it every single day, simply because we can't eat or sell it all! If even half of that food was shared, not only would the issue of hunger be eliminated, but the waste problem too! I can help achieve this by sharing the excess that I have with others. I could donate food, money, or my time to a charity, or even just bring food to the homeless. It isn't hard to help!
Hey! The answers are C, D, and E Have a great day :)
If your options are:
<span>A. It allowed future legislators to reword the constitution.
B. It allowed future legislators to abolish the constitution
C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution.
D. all of the above
I would say the answer is </span>C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution. This article basically says that the Constitution doesn't have to remain identical until the end of time (however perfect or adequate it is). It can be changed (amended) under certain conditions - if two thirds of the houses or a few states agree about it, they can call a convention and propose the changes they would like to make.
