Answer:
B. Military force is an easy way to replace an unfriendly foreign leader
Explanation:
The US has been using its military way to often as a tool of its foreign policies in the past century. While it was understandable during the Cold War, after it ended it is simply absurd. It seems that whenever the US has problems with some leader of another country where it has some interest, it employs its military, attacks the country, and takes down the unwanted leader. While some may argue that the US military has acted as peacekeeper, society builder, bringing democracy, in practice it has been the total opposite, and we have Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to witness for it, being left in ruins, total chaos, and becoming fertile grounds for terrorist basis.
During the early nineteenth century, the Jeffersonian Party's base of strength was in the south
The party was formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison around 1792. It was opposed to the centralizing policies of the new Federalist Party as it believed that a strong central government posed a threat to liberty
Speculation<span> involves trading a financial instrument involving high risk, in expectation of significant returns.
SO i beleive its
the 2nd one</span>
Based on the way things went over time, one can say that the popularity of Ali's stance increased positively.
<h3>What did Ali do?</h3>
- Muhammed Ali refused to fight with the American army during the Vietnam war after he was called up to serve.
- He claimed that because he was a Black Muslim, he was allowed to be a conscientious objector.
At the time he refused to serve, feelings of patriotism and anti-communism were at an all time high and so he was berated for his decision. Within the decade however, anti-war sentiment spread across the United States and led to Ali being praised for his decision.
Find out more on Muhammed Ali at brainly.com/question/10552420.
C
ammunitiion was a big affect of world wars i learned about it in 9th grade/ i am in 9th grade
