Wait what are we suppose to do again ?
Beginning at the end of the nineteenth century, immigration into the United States rocketed to never-before-seen heights. Many of these new immigrants were coming from eastern and southern Europe and for many English-speaking, native-born Americans of northern European descent the growing diversity of new languages, customs, and religions triggered anxiety and racial animosity.
In reaction, some embraced nativism, prizing white Americans with older family trees over more recent immigrants and rejecting outside influences in favor of their own local customs. Nativists also stoked a sense of fear over the perceived foreign threat, pointing to the anarchist assassinations of the Spanish prime minister in 1897, the Italian king in 1900, and even President William McKinley in 1901 as proof. Following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in November 1917, the sense of an inevitable foreign or communist threat grew among those already predisposed to distrust immigrants.
The sense of fear and anxiety over the rising tide of immigration came to a head with the trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Sacco and Vanzetti were Italian immigrants who were accused of participating in a robbery and murder in Braintree, Massachusetts, in 1920. There was no direct evidence linking them to the crime, but—in addition to being immigrants—both men were anarchists who favored the destruction of the American market-based, capitalistic society through violence. At their trial, the district attorney emphasized Sacco and Vanzetti’s radical views, and the jury found them guilty on July 14, 1921.
Despite subsequent motions and appeals based on ballistics testing, recanted testimony, and an ex-convict’s confession, both men were executed on August 23, 1927.
The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch carries out the laws, and the judicial branch sees if laws are constitutional or not!
So it goes in order or Legislative, Executive, then Judicial! :)
Mark me as brainliest please
The outcome of the Battle of that was fought in Syria in 740 was that the Byzantines won a major victory over the maya-ds.
<h3>Who fought in Syria 740?</h3>
In the 740, there was a war in Syria between the may Arab army and the Byzantine forces in the battle known as the Battle of which was fought at Akroinon near the modern Phrygia, on the western edge of the Anatolian plateau.
The battle resulted in a decisive Byzantine victory. this was due to the fact of the may Caliphate's troubles on other fronts and the internal instability before and after the Abbasid Revolt, this put an end to major Arab incursions into Anatolia for three decades.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Battle of Akroinon
brainly.com/question/7438505
#SPJ1
C) Individual States
A guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence of the states. The Articles created a weak central government, therefore they only received the powers which previous colonies had recognized as belonging to the parliament.
Hope this helps :)