The claim that was made by Rachel Carson at the beginning of the video is that "if were are ever to solve the basic problem that comes with contamination, we must begin to count the many costs of what we are doing"
In the above she claimed that pesticide were doing a lot of damage to the environment. This claim was expressed fully in her book: Silent Spring.
<h3>What support does Carson provide for her claim?</h3>
To support her claim, she indicated that there were a lot of associated carcinogenic and effects resulting form tumors.
Here are the points Carson made:
- That the Chemicals irradiative and that they are modifying the way the world eco-system.
- That it it was impossible to lay down such a barrage of poisons on the surface of the earth without making it unfit for all life
- That the chemicals should not be called 'insecticides' but 'biocides'.
<h3>What claim is made by the chemical engineer? </h3>
The chemical engineer Mr. Robert White-Stevens claimed her suggestion that pesticides are destroying life are exaggerated and a distortion of actual facts.
According to the engineers, the real threat was not chemical but biological and that the threat was the insects that ravage the supply of food made for man and transmit diseases.
<h3>What appears on screen while the chemical industry representative is making his argument?</h3>
Images of insects flying all around perched on kids and on people were the images that was flashed on the screen as the chemical engineers made his counterclaim.
Learn more about claim:
brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer:
steyver call carton Memory
I will mark brainlist please help
Story : A Dog’s Tale by Mark Twain
4. Read this sentence from the selection.
“Whenever she heard a large word she said it over to herself many times, and so was able to keep it until there was a dogmatic gathering in the neighborhood.”
In this sentence the word dogmatic is used as —
• an insightful simile
• a descriptive metaphor
• a humorous play on words
• an illuminating allusion
5. In the last paragraph the narrator says his mother would “fetch out a long word.” The connotations of the word fetch remind the reader that the narrator’s mother —
• is well educated
• is a dog
• knows lots of big words
• likes to show off
8. What is ironic about the author’s mother showing off with her knowledge of the word unintellectual?
• Her child knew she didn’t understand the word correctly.
• The strangers all already knew the meaning of the word.
• As any intellectual would know, the word should be “nonintellectual.”
• She did not know any synonyms for the word.
9. Which type of person is most like the author’s mother?
• A high-performing student with an excellent memory for words
• A very verbal person who always has a quick answer that sounds good
• A dishonest person who tells lies on a regular basis
• A person who likes dogs a lot and works at a veterinary clinic
For the first one, I would start by mentioning the characters crime, add something about how it was inexcusable, then incorporate a condensed precis on the characters situation (leaving out any bits that could embody the characters freedom). And end with a statement that discloses that your appeal is unarguable because (enter main argument here) and that is why so and so should be imprisoned.
<span>For the second question, I would personally choose the feminist because it would in theory be easier to explain their basic philosophy and how it is affecting the plot. Because I don't know who the character is, I can't really elaborate further. But please contact me if you need any more help, I'll do what I can. </span>
