Answer
In the event that a purchase was made for a campaign without it being managed by the staff in charge of this management, with a proposal not to pay because the person who bought it was not this staff but the candidate, the selling company, Dubychek , is in everything correct when alleging the payment, the candidate knew of the situation and it is known that the representative, goes in the name of this candidate.
131.818182% and can round to 131.82
Answer:
<u>height</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>x</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u>3</u><u>5</u><u> </u><u>ft</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
From trigonometric ratios:

but:

adjacent is x
hypotenuse is 400 ft

Since they are similar, that means they are proportionally the same.
So KL is similar to PN
JL is similar to PM
So,
You need to find how much bigger is the second triangle from first.
It is proportionally scaled up.
KL/JL = PN/ PM
You basically put in order of triangles. Left triangle on left side of equal sign and right triangle on right side of equal sign. You put in denominator the similar sides and numerator the similar sides (the side that is similar to the side of the other triangle)
5/6 = PN / 9
Cross-multiply
PN * 6 = 5*9
6PN = 45
PN =45/6
PN =7.5
Answer:
The graph not have x-intercepts
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The x-intercept is the value of x when the value of y is equal to zero
we have

This is the equation of an absolute value in vertex form open upward
The vertex is the point (2,12)
The y-coordinate of the vertex is above the x-axis and the graph open upward
That means ----> The graph do not intersect the x-axis
therefore
The graph not have x-intercepts
<u><em>Verify</em></u>
For y=0
substitute in the equation

----> is not true
The left side of the equation cannot be a negative number
so
The equation not have solution for y=0
therefore
The graph not have x-intercepts
see the attached figure to better understand the problem