Answer:
she should look for a more recent source
Explanation:
the book from 10 years ago is too outdated
<span>Taking a tiny sip, the chef tasted the soup.</span>
Paragraph 3 shows evidence and your reasoning because it’s the last supporting paragraph and you have to give evidence good luck
Answer: In "Harrison Bergeson" the goverment created a society where everyone was made exactly equal by torturous and inhumane devices. They warped the idea that "all men are created equal" by changing it from "all men are equally important to the world no matter what the circumstance" to "all men are literally equal in every way, no matter what we have to do to make it that way." I do not agree with this interperatation because it does not help the society in any way to have everyone exactly equal in all things. Instead of created a solid base of fairness, it creates a crumbling foundation. With everyone being average intelligence, new ideas were most likely scarce and illogical, entertainment was probably bland, boring, and meaningless. This interperataion created a community that was more unequal than it started with and flawed in many ways.
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
