The statement "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 was created to protect consumers against false advertising by monopolies." is false.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act placed the obligation of responsibility for a company's financial reporting squarely on the shoulders of its top executives in order to safeguard investors from corporate accounting fraud.
It required chief executive officers (CEOs) and chief financial officers (CFOs) to personally attest to the correctness of the information in financial reports and to affirm that controls and procedures were in place to evaluate and verify that accuracy.
In reality, CEOs and CFOs had to personally certify that financial reports complied with Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) rules by signing them. Failure to comply with this might result in fines of up to $15 million and 20-year prison terms.
Hence, the given statement is false.
Learn more about the Securities and Exchange Commission:
brainly.com/question/3798508
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. Loan Estimate
Explanation:
The loan estimate has replaced the Good Faith Estimate in 2015. Both documents are given by the mortgage lender to the consumer. The main purpose of the documents is for the customer to compare different offers from different lenders.
The main difference is that the loan estimate form is more comprehensive and understandable for the customers.
Answer:
corporations can obtain financing at lower rates
Explanation:
Convertible debts are a type of long term capital financing that has the option of converting the debt into stock or equity. Corporations issue convertible debts to balance equity and liabilities.
A convertible debt will usually have a lower interest because the holder of the debt has the option of converting it to stock. A conversion occurs after a certain period. Investors willingly opt for convertible debts as the conversion aspect makes them less risky. Companies will opt for them because they are less expensive in interest payments, hence a cheaper form of obtaining capital.
Answer:
wholly owned subsidiary
Explanation:
A wholly-owned subsidiary is a form of subsidiary arrangement, between two companies, whereby a company is completely owned or its whole stock is bought by another company often referred to as Parent Company after the arrangement or the agreement of the acquisition.
It is also characterized by having control over its resources and specific mission, also operates independently.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is a wholly owned subsidiary
