Answer:
Keep the exact order that is shown
Step-by-step explanation:
The first exponential already has a point at (1, -2) which means the y-intercept would be less than -2, which is the lowest among the three
The second has a y-int at -2
Third has y-int at 2
33/20 as well as 1 and 13/20. First you look it up in the internet aka Google.
Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
Dealing with a fraction exponent on hand can be converted by using the fractional exponents rule where the fraction exponent is converted to something like this:
![64^\frac{2}{3} = \sqrt[3]{64^{2}}\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=64%5E%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B64%5E%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C)
As you can see, the denominator of the fractional exponent is now the index of the radical. Here is a guide to know what goes where.
![64^\frac{x}{y} = \sqrt[y]{64^{x}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=64%5E%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5By%5D%7B64%5E%7Bx%7D%7D)
Both the original problem (64^2/3) and the converted formula can be put into a calculator.
<u>Simplify (if you want to)</u>
<u />
<u />
<u />
64 to the power of 2/3 is 16.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
That number is irrational because it does not repeat and rational number repeats
Answer:
The rule or formula for the transformation of reflection across the line l with equation y = -x will be:
P(x, y) ⇒ P'(-y, -x)
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering the point

If we reflect a point
across the line
with equation
, the coordinates of the point P flips their places and the sign of the coordinates reverses.
Thus, the rule or formula for the transformation of reflection across the line l with equation y = -x will be:
P(x, y) ⇒ P'(-y, -x)
For example, if we reflect a point, let suppose A(1, 3), across the line
with equation
, the coordinates of point A flips their places and the sign of the coordinates reverses.
Hence,
A(1, 3) ⇒ A'(-3, -1)