1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
3 years ago
5

What are the arguments for and against appointing judges for life terms?

History
1 answer:
aev [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

1. The arguments for appointing judges for life terms is that "it gives job security, therefore enabling the appointed judges serve according to the rules of the land without being influence by the executive or legislative power out of worry that their appointment may be terminated at any given time if a decision is made against the executive wish.

2. The arguments against appointing judges for life terms is that some judges might serve with great impunity, knowing fully well that nobody is going to sack them again based on making decisions on crucial judgments, whether they serve in a right manner and according to the Constitution of the land or not.

You might be interested in
President Monroe pursued a policy of __________ for American Indians in the Southeast.
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

enticement

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The number of representatives each state has in the House is based on what?
Free_Kalibri [48]
I believe its population
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following characteristics are most associated with gilded age
alekssr [168]

Answer:

yvkvy

Explanation:

gig7if7

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the executive branch related to the legislative branch in a presidential government?
jenyasd209 [6]

1. The legislative branch makes the laws and the executive branch enforces them. The president has the power to veto laws passed by Congress and to issue directives, known as an executive order.

2. In parliamentary government the executive government is elected. Once the legislative branch is elected, the leader of whichever political party earned the majority of votes becomes the executive leader, known as the prime minister.

6 0
3 years ago
What happened as a result of the Marshall plan
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

he­ Marshall Plan didn't happen inside a government-insulated vacuum. While officials hurriedly sketched out their plans for the foreign funding, a vast propaganda campaign also got underway. The participating countries publicly heralded the Marshall Plan as a saving grace with posters, leaflets and other media. One such booklet distributed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs in the Netherlands contained a cartoon proclaiming "Without the Marshall Plan, your bread would be bare and so would your children," above an image of towheaded children dressed in rags

The sheer size of the grant demanded the American public's approval as well, and that pro-Marshall Plan message extended into the United States. The May 1948 issue of Kiplinger was devoted to taking advantage of the Marshall Plan's economic ripple effect. Certainly, U.S. industries profited from the jolt of exporting to Western Europe. After all, the lifeline wasn't just a pile of cash; it included foodstuffs, agricultural equipment and machinery. This also helped establish the United States as a longstanding trade partner and the global economic powerhouse of the second half of the 20th century.

Not surprisingly, the Soviet Union sat out of the celebratory jig over the Marshall Plan, and historians have since debated whether the plan exacerbated the Cold War tension. The Soviet Union fought back against Marshall Plan propaganda through the Communist Information Bureau, or Cominform. They also introduced a grant package called the Molotov Plan for Eastern bloc nations [source: Schaff]. Ironically, if the Soviet Union had remained involved in the Marshall Plan, the United States would've likely withdrawn its offer for economic support because it wouldn't finance a Communist government

On Dec. 31, 1951, the Marshall Plan ended six months earlier than originally planned. The Korean War had shifted the U.S. foreign policy focus, and Western Europe was experiencing a wartime manufacturing boom. Two years later, George C. Marshall received the Nobel Prize for spearheading the European Recovery Plan.

The effects of the program have continued in Europe. The postwar years were the first time that Western European countries had worked as closely for mutual gain. That international cooperation demanded by the Marshall Plan laid the groundwork for the formation of the European Union (EU). In an interesting twist of economic fate, today's gross domestic product in the EU and the value of its currency exceeds that of the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The wagner act of 1935 prevents u.s. employers from interfering when workers try to organize unions.
    11·1 answer
  • Objects created by artisans or craftspeople such as tools weapons or pottery are called
    5·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the WTO
    13·1 answer
  • The graph shows choice of party affiliation. Based on this graph, which percentage of poll respondents were Democrats in Novembe
    7·2 answers
  • At the Battle of Claremore Mound, the __________ attacked a(n) __________ village.
    5·1 answer
  • What religions have a Ten Commandments? If so which religions and are they the same or different?
    14·2 answers
  • Which reason led to the establishment of colonies in both Virginia and the Carolinas?
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone answer this question for me please 2-3 sentences please hurry
    8·1 answer
  • (WILL MARK BRAINLIEST) The following excerpt relates to which amendment of the Bill of Rights?
    7·1 answer
  • Canten alguna historia de 5 párrafos pls no tengo nada es para un trabajo
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!