What are the arguments for and against appointing judges for life terms?

History

1 answer:

aev [14]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

1. The arguments for appointing judges for life terms is that "it gives job security, therefore enabling the appointed judges serve according to the rules of the land without being influence by the executive or legislative power out of worry that their appointment may be terminated at any given time if a decision is made against the executive wish.

2. The arguments against appointing judges for life terms is that some judges might serve with great impunity, knowing fully well that nobody is going to sack them again based on making decisions on crucial judgments, whether they serve in a right manner and according to the Constitution of the land or not.

You might be interested in

What was the name of the policy that enabled President Jackson to reward his supporters with jobs

lyudmila [28]

It is called the spoil system. The presidents could choose whoever they wanted to be put into office. Does this answer your question?

6 0

3 years ago

What factors made Cyrus the Great and Darius successful in ruling<br> the Perian Empire?

valina [46]

Answer:

In October 539 bce, the greatest city of the ancient world fell to the Persians. In the Bible (e.g., Ezra 1:1–4), Cyrus is famous for freeing the Jewish captives in Babylonia and allowing them to return to their homeland. Cyrus was also tolerant toward the Babylonians and others.

7 0

2 years ago

Why did saddam Hussein order his army to invade Kuwait

sergejj [24]

<span>Hussein believed that Kuwait was stealing oil that rightfully belonged to Iraq</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Technological advancements such as the compass, astrolabe, and caravel contributed to the

Nana76 [90]

The exploration and travel of the world

4 0

3 years ago