1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
4vir4ik [10]
3 years ago
8

Hey y'all I just really need help with this question so if y'all didn't mind and try to help me that would be greatHELP ME PLEAS

E I'LL MARK YOU THE BRAINEST!!!!!!!!​
​

History
2 answers:
zzz [600]3 years ago
5 0
The development of a written language in ancient Egypt allowed for a society to form where people could much easier communicate and pass on information, allowing for more trading, information, etc
adell [148]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

writing made Egypt one of the most civilized and technologically advanced at the time because of trade and politics,thanks to their writings we know how they keep their society stable between economic,politics and war management like reports of the battlefield or the monthly crops and sell/buy

You might be interested in
At processing stations, officials met with immigrants to determine their medical condition and
cupoosta [38]
I think that correct answer is C
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Compare and contrast transcription and translation. Be sure to include how they are the same and how they are different.
jolli1 [7]

Transcription is the process of written down information that may come from a speech or sing language, a video or some audio form of lecture, it is related mostly to the process of turning an oral content into a written content, but you can also do the transcription of a manuscript.

While translation is getting the information that is being communicated from one language to another, translation always involve two languages or more. Translation can be done from oral form to oral, or from oral form to written form, but in both cases the language is changed.

Transcription and translation are the same as they covert information.

  *Transcription will convert the form, for example from oral to written.

   *Translation will convert from one language to another language, for example from english-spanish.

Transcription and translation are different regarding number of languages involved in the process.

  *Transcription normally involves one language.

  *Translation involves at least two languages.

Transcription and Translation are different regarding the skills required.

  *Transcription will require good knowledge in the language you are transcribing the information, good listening and typing skills.

  * Translation will require fluency in the languages you are working it and also that understand as a native how some colloquial expression work, also good grammar knowledge of both languages.





5 0
3 years ago
Explore and Discuss
melomori [17]

Answer:

Considering these questions:

1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)

<em />

<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>

<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>

<em> c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>

2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?  

Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains how Kerouac’s writing style reflects the values of the beat generation? His conventional writing s
emmasim [6.3K]
His free-form writing style is nonconformist.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the President of Syria during the Syrian War conflict?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

President Bashar al-Assad

Explanation:

More than 11 million others have been forced from their homes as forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad and those opposed to his rule battle each other - as well as jihadist militants from so-called Islamic State. This is the story of the civil war so far, in eight short chapters.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which Bantu migration extended the farthest south?
    5·1 answer
  • Which two parties emerged after the whiskey rebellion?
    13·2 answers
  • How did betty friedan and gloria steinem contribute to the feminist movement during the 1960s and 1970s?
    10·1 answer
  • Where was the first English attempt at colonization in the New World?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did different ethnic groups resist the ottoman empire in the 1800’s?
    13·1 answer
  • Some of the Pygmies of the Congo are the____and the____
    11·1 answer
  • What can you infer about triangular trade?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how the Electoral College system works.
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a reason why Great
    9·2 answers
  • O
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!