1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
13

HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS IN UR OWN WORDS!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago
8 0
1. They originated from the Middle East.
2. Assyrians produced fearsome soldiers as well as innovative generals. They used chariots, iron weapons, and siege equipment to dominate their enemies.
3. They Assyrians ruled an empire that stretched over 1,000 miles from the Nile River to the Caucasus Mountains.
Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
A.
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Both have a strong central government

7 0
3 years ago
REFLECT! John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. Do you agree with him? Why or why not
Trava [24]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I do not agree with what John Green said.

John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. His arguments were that the Persian life was not bad. Persians ruled prosperous cities. And he comments that life was not easy in ancient Greece if you were a woman or a slave.

Of course, Greece was not perfect and had many issues. But the Persia Empire also had its many issues too.

I think it was good that Greece won the Persian Wars. The Greek victory established a foundation of a classical time in which Greece "exported" the idea of democracy to other states, as well as the philosophical ideas of great thinkers of Athens. Arts, literature, sculpture, and architecture were other important Greek influences that transcended the test of time.

8 0
3 years ago
2 points
Rudiy27
The progressives I think..please tell me if im right to make sure.
3 0
3 years ago
Describe the reasons New England was ideal for the development of factories.
laila [671]

answer:

new england was ideal for the development for factories because the ppor soil caused people to leave their farms, to find work, river provided water power to run machinery, easily accessible ports for passage, proximity to resources.

explanation:

  • credits: online source
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which term describes periods of the economy in which large demand for a good leads to more of that good being produced, followed
Volgvan

Answer:

boom and bust cycle

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which southern industries used raw materials from the south after the civil war
    13·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Navigation Acts?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement about woman in the 1800s is true
    5·2 answers
  • Tati was involved in a car accident. The first court to hear the case ruled the accident was her fault. She believes the first c
    14·1 answer
  • Why was travel by boat between greenland and europe made increasingly difficult from about 1350–1850? geog 2050?
    6·1 answer
  • When did Uganda get her independence
    15·2 answers
  • A(n)<br> clause should always be separated from the rest of the sente<br> So and yit
    5·1 answer
  • Where were some of China's brightest people sent during the Cultural Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the meaning behind red and green (the Christmas colors)?
    5·1 answer
  • Thomas Hobbes- Who is the government? does it ever change?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!