If the two territories had formed different states, the indigenous population would have greater political representation, and the state of Oklahoma would have a smaller indigenous population.
<h3>Why would the indigenous population have greater political representation?</h3>
- Because the state would have indigenous political representatives.
- Because the state government is made up of indigenous people.
- Because the political and social structure of the state would be geared towards the social well-being of the indigenous people.
The separation of the state of Oklahoma into two states would be very beneficial for the indigenous peoples as they would have greater political, social, and even economic relevance in the state formed by the indigenous territories, which would allow for greater representation at the national level.
Thus, Indians could structure their state by considering the social resources important to their tribes and choosing the best way to maintain their rights and duties as American citizens who live within the traditions of Native peoples.
Learn more about indigenous peoples:
brainly.com/question/27791311
#SPJ1
A supremancy clause allows the National Government to out do smaller
levels of Government, in doing so can prevent unfair policies and a lack
of justice in that form of Government that's all wrong
Simply StatedThe Supremacy Clause makes invalid any law passed by a
State or local government that is in conflict with a federal law. In
other words, federal law is "supreme."
Though that concept seems
simple, it's application is not. So don't start throwing around the
"supremacy clause" unless you understand how the courts apply it. The importance of the Supremacy clause is that it establishes that the
Constitution and Federal Law are the absolute law of last resort in the
United States. By that, it means that the Constitution or Federal Law
will win in any conflict between it and any state or local law. Thus,
all states are bound to the limits placed on them by the Constitution
and federal law.
In practice, here's what it means: no state or
locality can pass a law which prohibits something expressly allowed by
the Constitution or Federal law, nor may a state or locality allow
something expressly forbidden by the Constitution or Federal law.
C. Congress, However according to Article 2 Section 1 of the United States Constitution, Congress may not change the president's salary while he is in office.
The Soviet Union and the satellite nations refused to take money offered in the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was meant to help nations recover from World War II by providing money to stabilize the economy and rebuild infrastructure.
The Soviet Union knew that the United States was using this money as a means to form alliances. This is another reason why they refused to take it.
This helped lead to the idea of containment, as the US was trying to stop European nations they helped through the Marshall Plan from becoming communist.
Answer:
For number 8 is B and number 9 is B
Explanation:
Not to sure what is for number 9
