1. Assuming that the underlined words are 'Carl Sandburg,' the correct answer is A. simple subject. Although you may be led to believe this is a complete subject (because it consists of more than one word), in fact, it is not. Carl Sandburg is the name and the surname of one person, which is why it is considered to be a simple, rather than a complete subject.
2. Assuming that the underlined words are '<span>served as a soldier during the Spanish-American War,' the correct answer is D. complete predicate. As you can see, these words include the simple verb served, as well as all other words which modify, or describe that verb. This is why this is complete, rather than a simple predicate. Simple predicate would be only the word served.
3. Assuming that the underlined words are 'would influence,' the correct answer is B. simple predicate. Similarly to the first sentence, you may be led to believe this is complete because there are more than one word in the phrase. However, the verb phrase would influence is considered to be one entity given that it is only a particular tense of that verb. Even if it said 'had been influencing' instead of 'would influence,' it would still be a simple predicate.</span>
I am not very sure but I would probably use on the other hand or therefore.
Answer:
Infinitive Phrase
Explanation:
An "Infinitive Phrase" is a phrase which acts together as an adjective, adverb, or noun as the result of combining an
infinitive with complements and modifiers.
An infinitive phrase usually begins with an infinitive which is combined with complements and modifiers. It can function as the actor(s) and complement(s). It can also function as direct object(s), or of the action or state expressed in the infinitive.
An example is:
"I have a books to sell before class".
The infinitive phrase modifying "books".
to sell (infinitive)
When making a conclusion, it is important to note:
- The previous details
- The topic sentence
- The theme
<h3>What is a Conclusion?</h3>
This refers to the arrival of a point after different evidence have been given and this signals the end.
With this in mind, we can see that for a person to make a conclusion, then he must have made some previous claims and given sufficient supporting evidence which would help to validate the claim and make the conclusion valid.
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better overview of the concept.
Read more about conclusion here:
brainly.com/question/24542637
