1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lapatulllka [165]
2 years ago
13

PLEASE HELP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!

History
1 answer:
irakobra [83]2 years ago
3 0
B, A is more late 1900s and c is all over
You might be interested in
Athens leader who would strengthen the city-state into an empire and made many reforms that would lead to direct democracy
inna [77]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How have international relations shaped and guided the development of the United States, specifically the nation’s government, p
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.

The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.

This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.

International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.

6 0
2 years ago
All of the following were effects of the civil war except what
belka [17]

There were various effects of the Civil War but one thing that was not an effect was Reduced rate of industrial production in the north.

<h3>How did the Civil War benefit the North?</h3>

The North benefitted from the Civil War because the Civil War was rarely fought on Northern soil which meant that their industries were not destroyed or damaged by war.

In fact, the North was able to increase industrial production to be able to provide their soldiers with more weapons and provisions to fight the war, thereby increasing industrial production.

Options for this question include:

  • Reduced rate of industrial production in the north
  • Increased rate of industrial production in the north
  • Massive destruction of Southern infrastructure

Find out more on the effects of the Civil War at brainly.com/question/11470945

#SPJ1

7 0
10 months ago
Regions by waterways tend to have
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

The answer is A. access for more trade

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Zulu of Africa attack Dutch colonists?
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Zulus, a migrant people from the north, also came to southern Africa during the 17th century, settling around the Tugela River region. In December 1878, Cetshwayo rejected the British demand that he disband his troops, and in January British forces invaded Zululand to suppress Cetshwayo.

Explanation: hope it helps ^w^

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 332 BC, which military leader defeated the Persians and annexed Egypt to be part of his Macedonian Greek empire?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did The first break come into Europe and North America
    14·2 answers
  • Where do most of the people in Australia live
    5·2 answers
  • Globalization has the largest effect on
    13·1 answer
  • Help me plzzzzzzzzzz
    5·2 answers
  • G
    14·2 answers
  • 2. Following the American Revolution, most U.S. citizens wanted a single
    8·2 answers
  • What was the standard issue rifle for the Japanese imperial army in WW2 ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a form of technological progress that aides economic growth?
    7·2 answers
  • What does Berryman’s portrayal of Hitler and Stalin tell you about how he viewed these two figures?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!