1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
2 years ago
12

Please answer all three I will give brainliest!!

History
2 answers:
ioda2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. He was worried that the judicial branch had given itself too much power. Why did Robert Livingston and James Monroe go to France to meet with the French foreign minister? Jefferson decided as president he didn't have the authority to buy Louisiana

2.Why was New Orleans important to settlers in the western regions of the U.S ? Because New Orleans was a very important trading port. ... The New Orleans was very important for importing and exporting goods;Mississippi River was a major transportation for settlers and good to ship items east.

3.I don't think the French believed that the Louisiana Territory was important land for their country because they offered all of Louisiana to the Americans very easily and at a cheap price ($15 million to double the size of the U.S.) when the Americans just wanted the New Orleans territory.

HOPE THIS HELPS

Brilliant_brown [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1. To buy New Orleans

2. New Orleans was a very good trading port and was very important for importing and exporting goods

3I don't think the French believed that the Louisiana Territory was important to land for their country because they offered all of Louisiana to the Americans very easily and at a cheap price ($15 million to double the size of the U.S.) when the Americans just wanted the New Orleans territory.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Government leaders have decided to build a new school for the local school district.
Brrunno [24]

The answer is.

The type of technology used within the school.

the installation of a fountain

and the equipment needed in the cafeteria to provide healthy or unhealthy lunches.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many original amendments to the Constitution were added and ratified by 1791? A. 25 B. 10 C. 5 D. 15
Flura [38]
The answe should be A
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
2 years ago
Who has the final authority over all military matters?
vivado [14]

The president has the final authority .


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Rabin's primary motive for negotiating peace with the arabs?
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

To bring an end to the Israeli Palestine conflict.

Explanation:

Rabin's primary motive for negotiating peace with the Arabs was to bring an end to the Israeli Palestine conflict. Since the 1920s the conflict arose due to the inter-communal violence in mandatory Palestine between Israeli and Arabs but erupted to full-scale hostility during the civil war in the period 1947 and 1948. When Robinson became the prime minister, he pledged to waste no time in searching for peace by declaring Israelis change of direction of right-wing governance. He advocated for peace, reconciliation and cooperation which was being witnessed globally.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE PLS HELP!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • when this was published in early 1776, many americans colonist became convinced that they should act to form a new kind of natio
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first Germanic ruler of Rome?
    7·1 answer
  • Voters grew tired of reconstruction in part because?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Stalin gain complete control
    11·1 answer
  • What was accomplished at the constitutional convention in 1787?
    7·2 answers
  • During the early years of the United States, what difficult decision did Americans and American presidents often face?
    7·1 answer
  • The cotton gin was invented by Eli Whitney in 1793.
    15·1 answer
  • The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Marbury v.
    6·1 answer
  • Climate change is a cyclical event in the history of the Earth. In recent years, increased
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!