Answer:
i use to but i am retired i was a pro and i was good till the wolf came lost all my fans and my wife and kids i may be registered as a 12 year old but an am 27 years old
Explanation:
Answer:
Dear Father,
In his letter, Nadeem has informed me that mother is not feeling well. He has given me a hint about her poor health. I am much disturbed to know all of this. I am sure, you will be taking proper care of her. She is the patient of high blood pressure and sugar.
It is better to get her checked by a specialist. Further, kindly arrange a whole time nurse for her, who can take care of her on regular basis.
Please keep in touch With me in this regard.
Yours affectionately,
Joe.
Explanation:
We can actually infer here that what was more important to Mile's father was his son's education.
<h3>Who is Miles Morales?</h3>
Miles Morales is actually known to be a comic book character.
The book, Miles Morales: Spider-Man was written by Jason Reynolds, an award-winning New York Times bestselling author.
We see here that the father of Miles is more concerned about his son's education. He places that as important.
Learn more about comic books on brainly.com/question/12115569
#SPJ1
Explanation:
An American is relating to or characteristic of the United States or it's inhabitants.American literature and literature,in general,holds a close relationship with the reality it's been written in.It projects the writer's identify,desires and beliefs,this is not only reflected in the actions of the characters in some cases but also in the language they use,how they develop under certain situations,the direct beliefs started in the text in some cases.As the author is a part of a society that in a way or another influences the way he creates his identity,it's way to say his creation also projects the American Identity.
I'll just post the text where the statement "note an irony in my argument" is found.
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
