1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marusya05 [52]
3 years ago
13

Ang daigdig ay hugis (1)

History
1 answer:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

bilog

Explanation:

binobo Ito ng rubig at lupa at iba pang uri at Ito pinalilibitan ng tubig

You might be interested in
What replaced horse drawn railroad cars?
Mice21 [21]
The steam engine replaced horse drawn railroad cars. The steam engine was a revolutionary invention. It would forever change transportation.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A government promoting the involvement of all men in government emerged in what country?
iren [92.7K]
A government promoting the involvement of all men in government emerged in "Ancient Athens," since there was a system of "direct democracy" there in which all eligible citizens could vote directly on legislation. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what year were Indians granted suffrage in New Mexico?
Margaret [11]

The Indians granted suffrage in New Mexico in the year of 1948. I know that it is correct, because I just took the quiz on E2020 and I got it right.

I hope this helps. Have a good day and god bless u. =D

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The two proposed plans for the Constitution agreed on
anygoal [31]
<span>B. Having three branches of government-- following Enlightenment ideas government should have checks and balances with multiple branches.

The proposed plans for the Constitutional Convention, New Jersey Plan and Virginia Plan, agreed that the new government needed to have checks and balances with branches of government. They agreed there needed to be a legislative branch to make laws, an executive branch to preside over everyday affairs, and a judicial branch to run the courts. These three branches would ensure no singular power could take over and rule as a tyrant.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why have eradication efforts failed to eliminate the drug trade? A. The efforts actually made drug crops easier to produce. B. T
    8·2 answers
  • After World War II, many countries belleved in the principle of collective security, which means that
    15·1 answer
  • Which executive department includes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Bureau of Standards, the Patent and
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Washington choose cabinet members from both Northern and Southern states?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the erie canal help the nation grow?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the role President Grant had in the passing of the 15th Amendment:
    6·1 answer
  • What was life like in America prior to colonization?
    13·2 answers
  • Which person was an important leader of the conservation movement?
    8·2 answers
  • What did city-states in Sumer have in common?
    6·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from the story and answer the question.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!