This is an interesting question, however very subjective. There are no set 'correct' or 'incorrect' answers, unless this question is linked with a broader concept that you have been learning about? But here would be my answer...
Firstly, I do believe this is impossible. But this is a pretty closed answer, unless I give reasoning. It also depends what you mean by harmony? In this answer I am assuming you mean no conflict- so forgive me if I have totally misunderstood.
1- Oppression
It is inevitable that people will have different agendas, or motives for wanting to do certain things. This causes conflict, obviously including negative conflict. To achieve 'Harmony', some people would have to compromise on their beliefs and actions- and how they live their lives. Who would be the ones compromising? If there was complete harmony, these people would be unable to question this, or even unwilling. People would most probably become 'brainwashed', unaware of the compromises they are making in their lives. This brings up another very interesting question- Is peace and harmony more important than free will?
2- Extreme boredom/ lack of meaning to anything
Would harmony even exist if there was no conflict? To put it in other words, how would you explain harmony without referring either directly or indirectly to conflict?
What gives people the drive to fight for what they want? Not all conflict is negative, and one conflict can appear positive to one person, and negative to another.
What would we do all day? Many jobs would simply cease to exist- Lawyer? No. Relies on conflict. Social worker? Same thing. Even less obviously linked jobs such as musicians, teachers, politicians, athletes, would be affected. Ever noticed how on the news, many of the stories are about conflict? That is what interests us. Gives us something to debate about. There would be no diversity in culture, perhaps we would all be vegetarians or vegans (if 'everyone' refers to all living organisms on earth). Upon further reflection, harmony doesn't seem as much of a 'utopia', or perfect world, as perhaps it first seems
Answer:
<u>Random Sample</u>
Explanation:
The Random Sample is a method that consists of randomly selecting a portion (a sample) from a population that is being studied, in order to collect specific data from that population. Such a representative sample is meant to be unbiased because all individuals have the same opportunity of being chosen (they are chosen by chance). Therefore, when, starting at a random point, researchers contact every hundredth person on the voter list to ask about candidate facial expressions, they are using the Random Sample technique.
Answer: The difference is the entire idea and quality that made you make that successful decision in the first place. For an un successful decision, the determination to success when you made that decision was not yet met to criteria just yet.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Social influences
Explanation:
Social influence: In psychology, the term "social influence" is described as a procedure that involves the degree to which a person changes or alters his or her behavior in order to meet or satisfy the demands of a specific social environment. However, social influence can be of different forms including persuasion, conformity, leadership, obedience, peer pressure, socialization, marketing, and sale, etc.
In the question above, the given statement represents social influence.
