21 is 30% of 70 because .3*70=21
Answer:
C.
Step-by-step explanation:
A - Perpendicular lines always touch each other at least once.
B - Parallel lines never touch.
D- Not always true.
C is true. If they are not in the same plane they are skewed lines.
Answer:
The slope is -2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
With this its easier to get all of the x's on one side.
distribute the -2/3 to the x and 1. Also add a 2 on each side.
Thats leaves you with y=-2/3x+4/3
You than want to make a chart of x's and y's so you know what this graph looks like
x|y
-3|(10/3)
-2|(8/3)
-1|2
0|(4/3)
1|(2/3)
2|0
3|(-2/3)
To find the slope, it's (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
So in this case, (0-2)/(2+1)
The slope is (-2/3)
Answer:Write in slope-intercept form, y=mx+b
.
y=4x+43
hope this helps
Answer:
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we suspect the variability of concentration F - test is applied.
n1=10 s1=4.7
n2=16 s2=5.8
And α = 0.05.
The null and alternate hypothesis are
H0: σ₁²=σ₂² Ha: σ₁²≠σ₂²
The null hypothesis is the variability in concentration does not differ for the two companies.
against the claim
the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies
The critical region F∝(υ1,υ2) = F(0.025)9,15= 3.12
and 1/F∝(υ1,υ2) = 1/3.77= 0.26533
where υ1= n1-1= 10-1= 9 and υ2= n2-1= 16-1= 15
Test Statistic
F = s₁²/s₂²
F= 4.7²/5.8²=0.6566
Conclusion :
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
