Durante muchos años se ha considerado que el rápido crecimiento económico de México durante el periodo 1934-1956 sólo fue posible por el estímulo de una política económica expansionista que fue financiada de manera inflacionaria. De ahí el contraste con el desarrollo estabilizador de los años sesenta, que se considera la época de oro del crecimiento mexicano con estabilidad de precios. En este trabajo se argumenta que esta percepción es un mito y que las autoridades hacendarias y monetarias fueron esencialmente prudentes durante esos años, hicieron uso de los instrumentos de política a su disposición para impedir el desempleo e intentaron mantener tasas de inflación moderadas. Más bien, es el efecto de choques externos, como la recesión externa y las guerras, lo que explica en gran parte la inflación alta en ciertos periodos que llevaron, irremediablemente, a la depreciación del tipo de cambio en 1938, 1948 y 1954. Este resultado implica que la política económica no necesitó del gasto público deficitario para estimular el largo periodo de crecimiento económico mexicano del siglo XX.
The answer choice that DOES NOT explain why the executive branch has become more powerful than the legislature is option A.
<h3>What is the Executive Branch?</h3>
This refers to one of the arms of government that is charged with protecting the people in times of war, charging taxes, regulating commerce, etc.
Hence, we can see that from the answer choices, one can see that the executive branch of government became more powerful because of different reasons, but option A is NOT part of the reason.
Read more about executive branch here:
brainly.com/question/81186
#SPJ1
Answer:
and are to be treated in all respects as those men ... The latter men were designated under a preliminary plan that would have sent ... Frazer replaced Private Moses Reed, who was dismissed for attempted desertion. ... According to “The Ethnohistory of a Common Object” by Dr. James P. Ronda, ...
Explanation:
In 1804 the first electoral college was put in place
<span>Given that most people living in this country are Polish descent, Poland is an ethnically homogeneus society. Homogeneous means the same or uniform, which is the opposed to diverse Ethnicity refers to customs, culture. You would expect that if 97% of individuals descent from Polish ethnic people, they preserve the traditions and culture, so they are ethnically homogeneous. So, the answer is the option b. ethnically homogeneous. </span>
