Answer:
Replaced at the height of his power, Richard had been compromised by the narrowness of his own power base and his personal inability to live up to the image that he created for the crown. He failed because he misread the signs around him, and was unable to raise the monarchy as an institution with himself at its head.
hope it helps :)
The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
Answer is: <span>French settlers were on friendly terms with Native Americans and they relied on them to provide furs.
</span><span>French settlers established the colony of Quebec in 1608 and developed economic and political relationships with many Indian groups.
</span><span>French went back to France in the winter months with ships laden with furs they had purchased from the Natives with weapons and horses.</span>
The descriptions and the category that they best describe regarding the eastern and western empires are:
Western Empire:
- Closer to invaders.
- Fewer resources.
- Weaker defenses.
Eastern Empire:
- More diverse.
- Closer to trade routes.
<h3>What were some differences between the Western and Eastern empire?</h3>
The Eastern Roman empire was able to last much longer than the Western empire because they were closer to trade routes. This gave them more resources and made them more diverse.
The Western empire had fewer resources which meant that they could not afford stronger defenses which was made worse by the fact that they were closer to invaders.
Find out more on the Western and Eastern empires at brainly.com/question/18698187
#SPJ1
