The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
Support their opinion through the use of facts. Make up fictional information to trick the reader. Share the opinions of others that are similar to theirs.
Answer: Clauses can be divided into two kinds: dependent and independent. A dependent clause contains a subject and verb, but cannot stand on its own as a complete sentence; an independent clause includes a subject and a verb, and expresses a complete thought.
Explanation:
<span>"You should thank the reader and state your expectation of a positive result" is what you should include in the closing paragraph of your letter of complaint, since this is more likely to get you results. </span>
