1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
3 years ago
13

How did scientific rationalism affect governments?

History
2 answers:
ratelena [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the correct answer is C OR D

Explanation:

Semmy [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

People pushed their governments to fund the work of scientists.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the Germans believe that the Schlieffen Plan would allow them to 2 points
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

The Germans believed that Great Britain would decide to stay out of the war.

Explanation:

Schlieffen in his plans had made plans to take France by surprise and that a big and successful attack against France was going to be enough to stop Britain from being involved in the war. And This would give the Germans time (Schlieffen had built his plans around six weeks) to move soldiers who had been fighting the French to Russia to take on the Russians.

The attack on France was to be done through Belgium and Luxemburg. Britain in 1839 had guaranteed Belgium her neutrality. Schlieffen's strategy for success was dependent on Britain not supporting Belgium.

7 0
3 years ago
Which country was responsible for introducing livestock and cattle ranching in the south<br> west
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
Hi!

Spain
was responsible for introducing livestock and cattle ranching in the south-west.
Have a good day and hope I wasn't too late.
3 0
4 years ago
Which answer best describes Andrew Jackson's view on federal funding of state improvement projects? (5 points)
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Jackson felt that federal funding of state projects was essential to prevent the states from having too much power.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

domesticated animals were used to haul food over long distances

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?
Ksenya-84 [330]
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).  "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting.  That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws.  The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.

I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too.  Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Politics are best defined as
    15·2 answers
  • How have we gained knowledge of the first inhabitants of North America
    9·1 answer
  • Help im on timer ;-;
    6·2 answers
  • Choose all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Which description applies to Zoroastrianism?
    12·2 answers
  • 3. Georgia farms produced goods
    8·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS WHOEVER GETS THIS RIGHT
    14·1 answer
  • When did the japanese internment camps end?
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following were examples of axis aggression leading up to World War II except
    11·1 answer
  • Explain what HUAC was?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!