The statements that about natural capital that are true are
- Natural capital is affected by trends in human populations.
- Natural capital is limited by the amount of natural resources on Earth.
<h3>Which is a natural capital?</h3>
The term Natural capital is known to be a term that connote the stock that pertains to renewable and non-renewable resources.
A good example are plants, animals, air, water, soils, minerals that are said to be combine to bring about a flow of gain to people."
Natural Capital are also called natural assets and services that are said to be neither manufactured but have a good for humans.
Therefore, The statements that about natural capital that are true are
- Natural capital is affected by trends in human populations.
- Natural capital is limited by the amount of natural resources on Earth.
Learn more about natural capital from
brainly.com/question/17448368
#SPJ1
Tienes alguna pregunta o al guy?
Answer: b. Neutral stimulus
Ivan Pavlov is known for his studies about classical conditioning where one can learn through establishing associations between different events and stimuli.
In his experiment about dogs, the bell represents neutral stimulus that is paired with food as unconditioned stimulus, which produce involuntary bodily response such as salivating.
Therefore, the bell as neutral stimulus before the experiment began can now trigger a response all on its own to that produced by the food. This means that an individual has learned that neutral stimulus is equals to something good just like the unconditioned stimulus.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy proclaimed that juveniles that are convicted even of the most heinous crimes should not be treated in the same way as adults. The court back in 2005 eliminated the capital punishment for juveniles and subsequently said that they could not be imprisoned for life for crimes other than murder and their hope living outside prison must be restored. Justice Kennedy also mentioned that, “children’s diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change” cast doubt on mandatory sentences, and that this “harshest possible penalty will be uncommon.”
The aforementioned change spread quickly across the nation, with individual state, where most juvenile justice issues are settled, which are using the same course of actions that are especially designed to rehabilitate juveniles, so much as the most grave cases. However, new change happened all over the United States when it comes to the treatment and arbitration of juveniles related to delinquency and criminal matters over the past twenty years
.