Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
Answer:
<u>Democracy is ineffective unless voters educate themselves on governing decisions. The structure of democracy depends upon the will of the majority. Democracy can encourage mob rule. The cost of democracy is something that many people don’t realize exists. Democracy requires more time to implement changes. The structure of a democracy is a person-first process. There is still the risk of creating a conflict of interest within the government. Democratic governments follow the “a chicken in every pot” system. Gridlock occurs frequently in democratic structures. It can require individual voters to accept an entire mandate for a single issue.</u>
<u />
<u>Hope this helped!</u>
Answer:
According to Charles Darwin, the competitive and strong features make the species evolve, rather than just a few.
Explanation:
The survivors mate with their unique traits.
