Usually you would like to sum it up in the conclusion.
Oppression and Depth of pain we all carried.
These two options seem like the best answers due to the passion you get from reading them. I would say the other two don't create enough sense of passion.
I hope this helps! :)
This is largely based off of personal preference, not factual thinking or reasoning. As such, our two answers would be different.
Answer:
The excerpt from Act III, scene ii of Julius Caesar that is the best example of Brutus's use of pathos is: "Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? If any, speak; for him have I offended. Who is here so vile that will not love his country?"
Explanation:
Pathos is one of the three literary persuasion devices, it appeals to the audience's emotions, the use that Brutus gives to pathos in this lines from Act III, scene ii of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare appeal to the love Romans are demanded to have for their country and there is no more emotional topic that patriotism in times of war and conflict.
<span>Based on this passage, the author most likely will argue that D. Glen Canyon would have been better off without the dam.
The author describes what the Canyon looks like now - there is no flora, and even less fauna because the animals have nothing to feed on. It is visually pleasing, but at what cost? The author then describes what the Canyon looked like before the dam was built and he implies that it looked so much better.
</span>
