1. Why did people from small states (states with fewer people) want all the states to hav ether same number of votes in the federal legislature? What did they fear?
A: Smaller states would be at a disavantage if votes are dependandant on population. A bigger state would have more delegates than the smaller ones. They feared having less power in elections and less representation, and that larger states would have the control.
2. Why did people from larger states (states with more people) want representation to be based on the population? What was their argument?
A: They believed that larger states should have more representation in Congress, proportionate to the state's population and size. That would give them more authority.
3. Why was the compromise creating a two-house chamber (the House of Representatives and the senate) to balance the needs of smaller and larger states the best solution? Explain.
A: The Compromise pleased the smaller states by giving them equal representation in the Senate regardless of its population, while it met the larger states expectations by determining that the House would be based on proportional representation. This way both large and small states had some authority in the federal legislature.
<u>Question 1</u>
The correct answer is: "they created a sense of inferiority that was inherently".
With the enactment of the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution, that granted equality of rights to all US citizens without discrimination in terms of race, some Southern states started to issue laws that indirectly tried to circumvent such provision and to prevent African Americans from having actual access to their constitutional rights.
For example, Jim Crow laws aimed to impede black citizens from voting, by establishing requirements such as having a certain income level or obtaining a certain grade in a literacy test. Such requirements excluded mostly black citizens, which were treated as inferior and actually they were positioned as such, when being excluded.
<u>Question 2</u>
The correct answer is: "housing patterns and economic opportunity
"
Segregation is not allowed on any legal document or official action in the United States. It was declared unconstitutional and forbidden some decades ago.
But the US is a country deeply affected by social and income inequalities. The main reason is the difference in social and economic opportunities that a person can have access to, and thesedepend drastically on the type of neighbourhood or community in which a person is born or lives.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This sentence shows Elion's determination and commitment to learn.
Answer:
A command economy is where a central government makes all economic decisions. Either the government or a collective owns the land and the means of production. It doesn't rely on the laws of supply and demand that operate in a market economy. A command economy also ignores the customs that guide a traditional economy.
Like what judge where they live or like what they have or the holidays ?
