Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the rest of the question states:
<em>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?</em>
<em>A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.</em>
<em>B. Even if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, people would not vote for either person.</em>
<em>C. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would continue to vote for Smith.</em>
<em>D. Even if Senator Smith decided not to run for office again, many people would vote for him as a write-in candidate.</em>
The prediction that is most likely to happen is that, if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would vote for him. We know, based on the passage, that Senator Smith is not well-liked among voters, as he is not considered to be responsive to the needs of voters. Therefore, it is very possible that Senator Smith would find it difficult to compete with another candidate.
Does this question have multiple choice answers? I'd love to help if you still need it.
It could make them understand past ideas better.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Historians are searching for causes and consequences that explain the situation and why. We try to think about the people who existed through the eyes.
Historians ask themselves questions while researching history. Historians make conclusions about the past through the answers to the questions.
A new perspective lets historians appreciate the study by improving their knowledge of historical theories.
A new study with historical subjects leads to findings that serve to equate historians with the new information in the official version of history. Naturally, this can rewrite history as new evidence can answer historical concerns.
For this reason, it is so important for historians to continue to ask questions and to create different viewpoints. For order to achieve this, they must be willing to hear or see various versions of what official history reported or even to oppose them.
