1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
3 years ago
11

How can changing the elements of a story (setting, characters, point of view, etc.) change the story? ​

English
2 answers:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Changing the elements of a story can change the way a story is portrayed or percieved. For example, changing something as simple as the setting can change the whole point of view a reader has towards the story. The whole plot or the charcter's personality can also change drastically. All of the elemnets of a sotry rely on eachother  and make it unique. The author chooses each element carefully to portray the plot and characters in a way that all the elements correlate to eachother.

In conlsuion, all elements depend on eachother and even a slight change in of the elements can drastically affect the others and the overall story in different ways.

Liula [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

ok um i think ,the setting can create the mood of the story,the point of view can allow you to see the actions of that specific character..and the characters can be mean or kind and effect the story... I tried i dont know if you have answer choices..

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In Whitman's "Song of Myself"....
nlexa [21]

Answer:

oi mate its D

free verse innit lad

whitmans a good poet

Explanation:

have a nice day laddie

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Exercise 1 Underline the verb in each sentence. In the blank, write T if the verb is transitive. Write I if the verb is intransi
stealth61 [152]

Salmon actually <u>swim</u> up rivers—intransitive verb

Verbs are words that indicate some type of action, feeling or existence in a sentence. They give the information about what the subject is doing.

The Cambridge Dictionary describes a transitive verb as the kind of verb that requires “having or needing an object.” These can be changed into passive voice.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes an intransitive verb as the kind of verb that is “characterised by not having or containing a direct object.” These verbs do not form a passive voice.

Example of intransitive verb:

The old lady felt tired.

Learn more about intransitive verb here

https://brainly.in/question/5817231

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
The author creates a picture of the wild that is a entirely negative b entirely positive c both positive and negative d difficul
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

The answer would be C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why does cyanide prevent active transport
LenKa [72]
Blocks a enzyme by going into the allosteric site.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
allen says people who support burners might note an irony in my argument explain what allen means using details from the editori
Alex73 [517]

The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?

The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.

The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In American Born Chinese, which event is an example of an internal conflict?
    10·1 answer
  • Read the passage below and answer the question.
    13·1 answer
  • When should the ves ending be added to form plural nouns?
    15·1 answer
  • Poets need to _____ words.
    7·2 answers
  • In "An Indian Father's Plea," what does Medicine Grizzlybear Lake ask the teacher to do for Wind-Wolf?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    11·2 answers
  • Plzs help do soon and its hard
    15·2 answers
  • What is the answer If the answer is question and then what is the answer?
    13·1 answer
  • Help please!!!!!!!!! ​
    12·1 answer
  • Modals Verb and Nouns
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!