1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melamori03 [73]
3 years ago
8

This technology didn't help explorers reach any new lands, but did help the spread of knowledge to other potential explorers.

History
1 answer:
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The compass didn't help explorer reach any new lands, but did help the spread of knowledge to other potential explorers. They explorers found other lands and new spices and places instead.

Explanation:

The explorers found new technologies helpful such as the new sailor, new ships and the compass. All these upgraded inventions helped the explorers explore new and better things, and places.

Explorers wanted to reach Asia and China, they wanted to explore spices and different crafts their cultures. Better maps were established to help explorers.

You might be interested in
What was the major issue in the case of worcester v. Georgia?
12345 [234]

Answer:

Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land-Goo/gle

Explanation:

Please help me with my question

Have a nice day

3 0
3 years ago
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which phrase best completes the diagram
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

you need to add the diagram

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
When are members of the House of Representatives chosen?
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

Every second year

Explanation:

The U.S. House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

please give me brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Because philip ii wanted a standing army he found it necessary to
Ulleksa [173]
The Philip II wanted to a standing army and he found it necessary to raise their taxes.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think the outcome of the french and Indian war was significant
    6·1 answer
  • How did the british relationship to india change after the sepoy rebellion?
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the best use for a city map?
    5·1 answer
  • One fundamental implications of federalism is that state policies
    7·1 answer
  • Golden age of indians gupta empire was known for
    14·1 answer
  • How does an ecosystem change during succession
    12·2 answers
  • A typical passage through the panama canal takes how long? 2 4 hours 8 10 hours 2 4 days 8 10 days
    13·2 answers
  • How did some American Indian nations seek to assimilate into white American culture in the 1800s?
    5·2 answers
  • What did Austria-Hungary accusing Serbia of doing?
    7·1 answer
  • (Mythology) What evidence is there that the myths of a world flood may be based on a historic event?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!